Exploring Vocabulary Learning Strategies in EFL: A Case Study of Sudanese University Students

Main Article Content

Keywords: Communicative Competence, Institutional Support in EFL, Mixed Methods Research, Sudanese University Students, Vocabulary Learning Strategies

Abstract

Background: Sudanese University students face significant challenges in English proficiency due to historical Arabicization policies and outdated pedagogical frameworks. While vocabulary is a primary predictor of linguistic success, a systemic gap exists between strategy awareness and long-term lexical retention.


Aims: This study investigated the relationship between Vocabulary Learning Strategies (VLS), institutional support, and actual proficiency (receptive and productive) among Sudanese undergraduates.


Methods: Using s triangulated quantitative and documentary design ($N=240$), the study utilized the Vocabulary Levels Test (VLT), Lex30, a Likert-scale VLS questionnaire, and a systematic analysis of university syllabi. Data were analyzed using Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) and psychometric validation.


Results: Psychometric tools demonstrated strong internal validity ($\text{VLT } \alpha = 0.86$; Lex30 $M = 14.2/30$). Latent profile analysis revealed a severe "Knowledge-Application Gap": 64% of students possess theoretical awareness of exploratory strategies, yet 30% of the total sample occupy an "Overlap Group" experiencing persistent lexical acquisition failures. SEM confirmed that while discovery strategies predict receptive ($\beta = 0.35$) and productive ($\beta = 0.29$) outcomes, consolidation strategies are the strongest predictors of productive mastery ($\beta = 0.41$). Crucially, institutional support moderates strategy effectiveness by 18% ($\beta = 0.18$). Documentary analysis revealed that 83% of syllabi ignore explicit strategy instruction entirely, and 0% feature systematic spaced-retrieval tasks.


Conclusion: The findings demonstrate that individual learner strategic awareness is heavily suppressed by a systemic instructional vacuum. Sudanese university curricula are overwhelmingly biased toward passive word recognition, failing to provide the structured consolidation routines required to transition vocabulary from short-term memory into active communicative competence. Rectifying this deep-seated proficiency gap requires immediate curriculum reform, institutionalized strategy modeling, and the integration of low-bandwidth, offline-capable digital learning tools.


 

Article Details

References

Adarkwah, M. A. (2021). “I’m not against online teaching, but what about us?”: ICT in Ghana post Covid-19. Education and Information Technologies, 26(2), 1665–1685. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10331-z

Adlan, D. A. Z. H. (2025). Post-war reconstruction and the digital divide: The crisis of Sudanese higher education. Nile Valley University.

Adlan, D. A. Z. H. (2026). Assessing the Impact of English for Specific Purposes Training Course on Professional Language Competence: An Applied Case Study. مجلة الشرق الأوسط للعلوم التربوية والنفسية 6(1),111–196. https://doi.org/10.56961/mejeps.v6i1.1327

Ahmed, S. T. S. (2018). Communicative Competence in English as a Foreign Language: Its Meaning and the Pedagogical Applications for Its Development. International Journal of English Language Teaching, 6(9), 27–33. https://doi.org/10.37745/ijelt.13

Al Fraidan, A., & Fakhli, I. (2024). Vocabulary learning strategies of university students: The case of preparatory year students and English major students. Porta Linguarum. An International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Learning, 41, 45–63. https://doi.org/10.30827/portalin.vi41.24321

Alhamami, M. (2019). Learners’ beliefs about language-learning abilities in face-to-face & online settings. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0162-1

Aljasir, N. (2025). Vocabulary learning strategies among Saudi EFL learners: a proficiency-level comparison using think-aloud protocols. Cogent Education, 12(1), 2472480. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2472480

Amerstorfer, C. M. (2020). The dynamism of strategic learning: Complexity theory in strategic L2 development. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 10(1), 21–44. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2020.10.1.2

Andualem, M. Y., Filatie, A. Y., & Chanie, B. S. (2025). Vocabulary learning strategy as a perceived predictor of EFL learners’ written receptive vocabulary knowledge among Ethiopian university students. Ethiopian Journal of Language, Culture and Communication, 10(1), 231–252. https://doi.org/10.20372/ejlcc.v10i1.1893

Arifah, F., Setiadi, S., Barnabas, R. A., Zulharby, P., & Haniah. (2025). Transforming Positive Language Attitudes into Communicative Performance: Evidence-Based Learning Strategies in Arabic Language Teaching. Proceeding of International Conference on Innovation, Reflection, and Creativity in Arts, Literature, and Language Education (I-CIRCALLED), 1(1), 163–175. https://doi.org/10.1234/ic.v1i1.62043

Behforouz, B., & Ghaithi, A. Al. (2022). Omani EFL Learners` Vocabulary Learning Strategies. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 13(1), 285–299. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol13no1.18

Boroughani, T., Behshad, N., & Xodabande, I. (2023). Mobile-assisted academic vocabulary learning with digital flashcards: Exploring the impacts on university students’ self-regulatory capacity. Frontiers in Psychology, 14(1112429). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1112429

Boulton, A., & Cobb, T. (2017). Corpus Use in Language Learning: A Meta-Analysis. Language Learning: A Journal of research in language studies, 67(2), 348–398. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12224

Dontre, A. J. (2021). The influence of technology on academic distraction: A review. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 3(3), 379–390. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.229

Gibson, C. (2016). Bridging English Language Learner Achievement Gaps through Effective Vocabulary Development Strategies. English Language Teaching, 9(9), 134. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n9p134

Godwin-Jones, R. (2018). Contextualized Vocabulary Learning. Language Learning & Technology, 22(3), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/44651

Hwang, G. (2021). Roles and Research Trends of Artificial Intelligence in Mathematics Education : A Bibliometric Mapping Analysis and Systematic Review. Mathematics, 9(6), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9060584

Kohnke, L., Moorhouse, B., & Zou, D. (2023). ChatGPT for Language Teaching and Learning. RELC Journal, 54(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231162868

Mahdi, Hassan Saleh. (2018). Effectiveness of Mobile Devices on Vocabulary Learning: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 56(1), 134–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633117698826

Mpungose, C. B. (2020). Emergent transition from face-to-face to online learning in a South African University in the context of the Coronavirus pandemic. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 7(1), 113. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00603-x

Nakata, Tatsuya, & Elgort, Irina. (2021). Effects of spacing on contextual vocabulary learning: Spacing facilitates the acquisition of explicit, but not tacit, vocabulary knowledge. Second Language Research, 37(2), 233–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658320927764

Nation, I. S. P. (2022). Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. In Cambridge Applied Linguistics (3 ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009093873

Rabadi, R. (2016). Vocabulary Learning Strategies Employed by Undergraduate EFL Jordanian Students. English Language and Literature Studies, 6, 47. https://doi.org/10.5539/ells.v6n1p47

Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in Language Teaching. Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/vocabulary-in-language-teaching

Teymouri, R. (2024). Recent developments in mobile-assisted vocabulary learning: a mini review of published studies focusing on digital flashcards. Frontiers in Education, 9(1496578). https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1496578

Webb, S., & Nation, I. S. P. (2017). How Vocabulary Is Learned. Oxford University Press. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/how-vocabulary-is-learned-9780194403559

Zhai, X., Chu, X., Chai, C. S., Siu, M., Jong, Y., Istenic, A., Spector, M., Liu, J., Yuan, J., & Li, Y. (2021). A Review of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Education from 2010 to 2020. Complexity, 2021(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8812542

Zhou, Y., & Zhou, M. (2025). A meta-analysis on mobile-assisted vocabulary learning: Do mobile applications help? ReCALL, 38(1), 75–93. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344025100335