Assessment of Scientific Tools for Kinematic Analysis in Sports Performance
Article Sidebar
Motion Capture Software,
Performance Analysis,
Sports Science,
Video Analysis
Main Article Content
Ajithkumar L
Abstract
Kinematic analysis is crucial in sports science and biomechanics for optimizing performance and helping in rehabilitation. This study compares fifteen kinematic analysis tools, namely Siliconcoach, Kinovea, Templo by Contemplas, Gaiton, Helix 3D By Rundna, Dartfish, Coach’s Eye, Vicon, Motion Analysis Corporation, Noraxon Myoresearch, Qualisys, Pro-Trainer, Xsens, Simi Motion, And Shutter Precision. The comparison focuses on performance benchmarks, usability, accuracy, reliability, and cost-effectiveness. High-end systems like Vicon and Qualisys excel in precision and real-time data processing, ideal for research and professional use, while tools like Coach’s Eye offer accessible yet less precise analysis suitable for general coaching. Usability varies, with Kinovea and Dartfish noted for their user-friendly interfaces, while advanced systems require more extensive training. Accuracy is critical, with top systems providing high precision through sophisticated technologies. Cost varies widely, from free tools like Kinovea to premium systems like Vicon. This study provides valuable insights for selecting the most appropriate scientific tools and methods
Article Details
Copyright (c) 2025 Ajithkumar L, Kumar P
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Ajithkumar, L., Kumar, P., & Singh R, R. M. (2022). Kinematical Analysis of Long Jumper Techniques by Using Silicon Coach Software. Proceedings - 2022 International Conference on Smart and Sustainable Technologies in Energy and Power Sectors, SSTEPS 2022, 346–349. https://doi.org/10.1109/SSTEPS57475.2022.00091
Akl, A. R., Hassan, I., Hassan, A., & Bishop, P. (2019). Relationship between kinematic variables of jump throwing and ball velocity in elite handball players. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 9(16). https://doi.org/10.3390/app9163423
Almeida, L. P. de, Guenka, L. C., Felipe, D. de O., Ishii, R. P., Campos, P. S. de, & Burke, T. N. (2023). Correlation between MOVA3D, a Monocular Movement Analysis System, and Qualisys Track Manager (QTM) during Lower Limb Movements in Healthy Adults: A Preliminary Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(17). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20176657
Belete, A., Yadav, A., Taye, B., & Yirsaw, B. (2024). Relationship of Selected Kinematic Variables with the Performance of a Goal Kick Techniques in Football Goalkeeper. American Journal of Sports Science, 12(3), 37–42. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajss.20241203.12
Drapeaux, A., & Carlson, K. (2020). A comparison of inertial motion capture systems: Dorsavi and xsens. International Journal of Kinesiology and Sports Science, 8(3), 24–27. https://doi.org/10.7575/AIAC.IJKSS.V.8N.3P.24
Fatima Al-Zahraa Nafaat Abdul Karim, & Intisar Kadhim Abdul Karim. (2024). Kinematic analysis of the time variable and its relationship to some bio-kinematic variables and the performance of the wheel skill on the floor movements mat for gymnast players aged 7 – 9. Modern Sport, 23(2), 0082–0092. https://doi.org/10.54702/fb58vq86
Kanko, R., Laende, E. K., Davis, E. M., Selbie, W. S., & Deluzio, K. J. (2020). Concurrent assessment of gait kinematics using marker-based and markerless motion capture. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.10.420075
L, A., P, K., Kumar, P., & P, K. T. (2024). Thematic Analysis on the Integration of Engineering Concepts in Physical Education: A Collective Approach for Innovative Transformation. Indonesian Journal of Sport, Health and Physical Education Science, 2(2), 77–83. https://doi.org/10.58723/inasport.v2i2.225
Lapresa, M., Zollo, L., & Cordella, F. (2022). A user-friendly automatic toolbox for hand kinematic analysis, clinical assessment and postural synergies extraction. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.1010073
Longo, U. G., De Salvatore, S., Carnevale, A., Tecce, S. M., Bandini, B., Lalli, A., Schena, E., & Denaro, V. (2022). Optical Motion Capture Systems for 3D Kinematic Analysis in Patients with Shoulder Disorders. In International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (Vol. 19, Issue 19). MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912033
Matsuzaki, Y., Heath, M. R., Khan, J. M., Spitzer, E., & Fabricant, P. D. (2021). Reliability of Two-Dimensional Video-Based Analysis in Adolescent Runners. In Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine (Vol. 9, Issue 7_suppl3). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967121S00072
Nwafor, C. J., Laurent, G. J., Rougeot, P., & Rabenorosoa, K. (2023). The Caturo: A Submillimeter Diameter Glass Concentric Tube Robot with High Curvature. Advanced Intelligent Systems, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/aisy.202200308
Pfister, A., West, A. M., Bronner, S., & Noah, J. A. (2016). Comparative abilities of Microsoft Kinect and Vicon 3D motion capture for gait analysis. Journal of Medical Engineering and Technology, 38(5), 274–280. https://doi.org/10.3109/03091902.2014.909540
Selvakumar, S., Bairavi, S., & Karthi, P. (2021). Biomechanics Analysis And Optimization Of Instep Kicking: A Case Study To Malaysian Footballer. International Journal of Aquatic Science, 12, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1177/ijas4n122021
Widhalm, K., Durstberger, S., Greisberger, A., Wolf, B., & Putz, P. (2024). Validity of assessing level walking with the 2D motion analysis software TEMPLO and reliability of 3D marker application. Scientific Reports, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-52053-z