Utilization Of Peer Tutorial Methods In Improving Learning Outcomes Lay Up Shoot VIII Grade Students Of SMP N 4 Rejang Lebong

Main Article Content

  Muslan

Abstract

Physical education not only focuses on psychomotor aspects (skills), but also includes cognitive (knowledge) and affective (attitude). Learning models are often considered less varied and monotonous. This research method is class action research. The process of research in the classroom includes planning, action, observation, and reflection stages. Data collection techniques are performed by observing field (observation), interviews and documentation. The tools used are curriculum, RPP and assessment tools that cover emotional, cognitive and psychological aspects. The data analysis used is qualitative descriptive. The classical mastery that must be achieved on Lay Up Shoot learning is 75%. The grade of classical learning of period I was 73.77% (discontinuous). While the grade of classical learning finance of cycle II reaches 83.40% (finished). Improved student learning results after an even semester (graduated) by 0.8 with high criteria. The conclusion of this study is that there is an increase in learning to shoot weapons with peer tutors in class VIII students of Junior State 4 Rejang Lebong Year 2022. Researcher suggestion is that the use of peer instruction can be motivated for teachers to be more creative in developing learning processes, improving learning outcomes and Lay Up Shoot skills.

Article Details

How to Cite
Muslan. (2023). Utilization Of Peer Tutorial Methods In Improving Learning Outcomes Lay Up Shoot VIII Grade Students Of SMP N 4 Rejang Lebong. Indonesian Journal of Sport, Health and Physical Education Science, 1(1), 9–19. https://doi.org/10.58723/inasport.v1i1.71
Section
Articles

References

Afandi, M., Chamalah, E., & Wardani, O. P. (2013). Model & Metode Pembelajaran di Sekolah (4th ed., Vol. 180). UNISSULA PRESS. Google Scholar

Ananda, R., & Fadhli, M. (2018b). Statistik Pendidikan (Teori Dan Praktik Dalam Pendidikan) (S. Saleh, Ed.). CV. Widya Puspita. Google Scholar

Annis, L. F. (2013). The processes and effects of peer tutoring. Human Learning, 10(1), 39–47.

Febianti, Y. N. (2014). Peer Teaching (Tutor Sebaya) Sebagai Metode Pembelajaran Untuk Melatih Siswa Mengajar. Edunomic, 2(2), 80–87. Google Scholar

Handoyo, H., Rusmiati, P., & Chan, A. A. S. (2019). Upaya Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Teknik Dasar Lay-Up Shoot Bola Basket melalui Penerapan Gaya Mengajar Latihan (Practice Style). Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan STKIP Kusuma Negara II, 22–29. Google Scholar

Hart, G. (2006). Peer learning and support via audio-teleconferencing in continuing education for nurses. Distance Education, 11(2), 308–319.

Khairat, N. I. (2020). Analisis Tingkat Keterampilan Dasar Lay Up Shoot Pada Pemain Basket Putera SMA Negeri 6 Soppeng. 1–8. Google Scholar

Kusuma, B. B. (2019). Bola Basket. Direktorat Pembinaan SMA - Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. Google Scholar

Mahmud, T. P. (2013). Penelitian Tindakan Kelas Teori dan Praktik. Penelitian Tindakan Kelas Teori Dan Praktik, 466. Google Scholar

Nurdiyanah. (2021). Penerapan Metode Peer Tutoring (Tutor Sebaya) untuk Meningkatkan Prestasi Belajar Siswa pada Pembelajaran Informatika Materi Aplikasi Pengolah Kata di Kelas X IPS 1 SMAN 4 Kota Bima Semester I Tahun Pelajaran 2020/2021. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Indonesia (JPPI), 1(2), 141–156. https://doi.org/10.53299/jppi.v1i2.49

Nuryadi, Tutut Dewi Astuti, Endang sri Utami, M. B. (2017). Dasar-dasar Statistik Penelitian (Gramasurya, Ed.; 1st ed.). Sibuku Media. Google Scholar

Saichudin, & Munawar. (2019). Buku Ajar Bola Basket. Wineka Media.

Sujatmiani. (2015). Penggunaan Metode Peer Tutoring dengan Kassitu untuk Meningkatkan Motivasi dan Hasil Belajar IPA Fisika. Jurnal Riset Dan Kajian Pendidikan Fisika, 2(2), 46–49. Google Scholar

Wahab, G., & Rosnawati. (2021). Teori-Teori Belajar Dan Pembelajaran (H. A. Zanki, Ed.). CV. Adanu Abimata. Google Scholar

Whitman, N. A. (2012). Peer Teaching To Teach is To Learn Twice. ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education. Google Scholar