Implementation of Authentic Assessment in PAI Learning in Improving Student Motivation and Learning Achievement at SDIT Semarak Rejang Lebong

Main Article Content

  Putri Adelia
  Rejabil Anbia
  Deri Wanto
  Mirzon Daheri

Abstract

The aim of this research is to evaluate the impact of using authentic assessment on the motivation and learning achievement of students at SD IT Semarak Rejang Lebong, especially in learning Islamic Religious Education (PAI). This research applies a descriptive and qualitative approach with a focus on SD IT Semarak Rejang Lebong. In line with John Creswell's definition of qualitative research, this methodology involves open data collection, analysis of text or images, representation of information through figures and tables, and personal interpretation of findings. The implementation of authentic assessment in PAI learning at SDIT Semarak Rejang Lebong is believed to be able to improve learning outcomes and student creativity. In this context, authentic assessment is considered very effective because it encourages students to demonstrate their individual abilities. Although some students may have unsatisfactory learning results, the majority of them overall get good grades. If there are students who have not reached Minimum Competency (KKM), the teacher takes remedial steps to provide additional assistance and improve student understanding. Overall, this research highlights that the implementation of authentic assessment in PAI learning at SD IT Semarak Rejang Lebong has a positive impact on students' motivation and learning achievement, namely with remedial steps taken to support their development.

Article Details

How to Cite
Adelia, P., Anbia, R., Wanto, D., & Daheri, M. (2024). Implementation of Authentic Assessment in PAI Learning in Improving Student Motivation and Learning Achievement at SDIT Semarak Rejang Lebong. Indonesian Journal for Islamic Studies, 2(2), 42–46. https://doi.org/10.58723/ijfis.v2i2.124
Section
Articles

References

Abidin, Y. (2012). Model Penilaian Otentik Dalam Pembelajaran Membaca Pemahaman Beroreintasi Pendidikan Karakter. Jurnal Pendidikan Karakter, 3(2), 164–178. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpk.v0i2.1301

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches, Ed. California: Sage.

Firmansyah, D., & Saepuloh, D. (2022). Social Learning Theory : Cognitive and Behavioral Approaches. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Holistik (JIPH), 1(3), 297–324. https://doi.org/10.55927/jiph.v1i3.2317

Gao, X., Li, P., Shen, J., & Sun, H. (2020). Reviewing assessment of student learning in interdisciplinary STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00225-4

Jhonson, E. B. (2002). Contextual Teaching & Learning: Menjadikan Kegiatan Belajar- Mengajar Mengasyikkan dan Bermakna. Bandung: MLC.

Madhakomala, R., Hakim, M. A., & Syifauzzuhrah, N. (2022). Problems of Education in Indonesia and Alternative Solutions. International Journal of Business, Law, and Education, 3(3), 135–144. https://doi.org/10.56442/ijble.v3i3.64

Ningrum, D. S. (2023). Perubahan Kurikulum Dan Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka Di Sdn 15 Pulai Anak Air Bukittinggi. Benchmarking, 7(1), 29–39. https://doi.org/10.30821/benchmarking.v7i1.14406

Schellekens, L. H., Bok, H. G. J., de Jong, L. H., van der Schaaf, M. F., Kremer, W. D. J., & van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2021). A scoping review on the notions of Assessment as Learning (AaL), Assessment for Learning (AfL), and Assessment of Learning (AoL). Studies in Educational Evaluation, 71, 101094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101094

Sirait, J. E. (2021). Analisis Pengaruh Kompetensi Guru Terhadap Keberhasilan Pembelajaran di Sekolah Dasar Bethel Tanjung Priok Jakarta Utara. Diegesis : Jurnal Teologi, 6(1), 49–69. https://doi.org/10.46933/dgs.vol6i149-69

Sofia, I., Nafla, S. A., Siraj, S., Situmorang, S., Wulandari, T., & Hidayatullah, T. Y. (2023). Kompetensi Guru Dalam Pelaksanaan Evaluasi Pembelajaran. EDUCATIVO: Jurnal Pendidikan, 2(1), 183–188. https://doi.org/10.56248/educativo.v2i1.125

Suardipa, I. P., & Primayana, K. H. (2020). Peran Desain Evaluasi Untuk Meningkatkan Kualitas Pembelajaran. Widyacarya, 4(2), 88–100. https://doi.org/10.55115/widyacarya.v4i2.796

Sulistyo, T., Eltris, K. P. N., Mafulah, S., Budianto, S., Saiful, S., & Heriyawati, D. F. (2020). Portfolio assessment: Learning outcomes and students’ attitudes. Studies in English Language and Education, 7(1), 141–153. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v7i1.15169

Supena, I., Darmuki, A., & Hariyadi, A. (2021). The influence of 4C (constructive, critical, creativity, collaborative) learning model on students’ learning outcomes. International Journal of Instruction, 14(3), 873–892. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14351a

Wang, X., Chen, Y., & Zhu, W. (2022). A Survey on Curriculum Learning. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 44(9), 4555–4576. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2021.3069908

Wijayanti, D., Anwar, S., Khairani, K., & Sukhaimi, N. A. (2022). Implementasi Inovasi Pembelajaran Geografi Tingkat SMA Dalam Kurikulum 2013. Journal on Education, 4(2), 837–843. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v4i2.496

Most read articles by the same author(s)